Alternative solution for determining the irrigation water quantity: ETGauge

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-0497-4331
dc.contributor.authorTas, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorKuzucu, Fatih Cem
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T12:00:21Z
dc.date.available2026-02-03T12:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractMeasuring the reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is difficult and costly. Some regions can have variable microclimates and these can often be quite far from climate stations. Therefore, it is optimal to use local measurements rather than a regionally calculated ET0. In this respect, one piece of equipment that provides cheap and reliable measurement results is ETGauge equipment. In this study, ET0 values measured with ETGauge equipment were compared with daily and monthly ET0 values calculated by five different commonly used empirical methods (ThornthwaiteAdj, Blaney-Criddle, Penman-Monteith = PM, Jensen-Haise and ASCE standardised Penman-Monteith = ASCE SZ PM). During the measurement period, daily ET0 values measured with ETGauge varied between 0-10 mm/day and the average was determined as 4.5 +/- 2.7 mm/day in the study area. In the calculations made with the empirical models, the change in ThornthwaiteAdj is 1.3-6.6 mm/day with an average of 3.8 +/- 1.6 mm/day, the change in Blaney-Criddle is 1.8-7.2 mm per day with an average of 5.1 +/- 1.4, the change in PM is 1.2-10.5 mm/day with an average of 5.8 +/- 2.7 mm/day, the change in Jensen-Haise was 5.8 +/- 2.7 mm/day with an average of 5.5 +/- 2.7 mm/day, and the change in ASCE SZ PM was calculated as 1.0-10.1 mm/day with an average of 5.4 +/- 2.5 mm/day. Considering the obtained results, the ETGauge equipment can be used safely in creating irrigation programmes.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Department of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University [FBA-2018-2653]
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by Scientific Research Projects Department of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University (Project number: FBA-2018-2653) .
dc.identifier.doi10.17221/25/2025-SWR
dc.identifier.endpage233
dc.identifier.issn1801-5395
dc.identifier.issn1805-9384
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105025593627
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage219
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17221/25/2025-SWR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/34576
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001533724800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCzech Academy Agricultural Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofSoil and Water Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20260130
dc.subjectASCE Standardised Penman-Monteith
dc.subjectBlaney-Criddle
dc.subjectFAO Penman Monteith
dc.subjectJensen-Haise
dc.subjectThornth-waite
dc.titleAlternative solution for determining the irrigation water quantity: ETGauge
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu