Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients: Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Features

dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorOgretmen, Zerrin
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Sevilay
dc.contributor.authorAkbal, Ayla
dc.contributor.authorZateri, Coskun
dc.contributor.authorCevizci, Sibel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:56:02Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:56:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to perform radiological and clinical determination of the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis and to evaluate associations with clinical findings. Materials and Methods: The medical files of 72 patients with psoriasis presenting to our clinic between years 2009-2014 with a prediagnosis of PsA were reviewed retrospectively. Hand, foot and sacroiliac joint radiograms were evaluated by a radiologist who was blinded to the patient's clinical status and who is experienced on musculoskeletal radiology. Patients with psoriasis were divided into two groups according to the presence of arthritis which was determined based on radiographic findings or on Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria. All patients' demographic characteristics, length of disease, nail involvement, smoking-alcohol consumption were recorded. Results: The mean age of all patients was 47.24 +/- 14.61 years, and the mean duration of disease was 14.13 +/- 11.92 years. Smoking and alcohol consumptions were determined in 54.2% (n=39) and 23.6% (n=17) of the cases, respectively. Nail involvement was determined in 56.9% (n=41) of the cases. PsA was determined based on radiological findings in 58.3% (n=42) of the patients. The mean age and age at onset of disease were higher in PsA (+) patients than in radiologically non-PsA subjects. Based on clinical findings, PsA based on CASPAR criteria was determined in only 18.1% (n=13) of all patients. Conclusion: A higher level of PsA was determined using radiological evaluation in this study. The main cause of this condition is the existence of asymptomatic-subclinical patients. A detailed medical history should therefore be taken from patients, and good clinical evaluation is very important. Radiological and clinical evaluation should be performed together in the diagnosis.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/tod.72692
dc.identifier.endpage91
dc.identifier.issn2146-3816
dc.identifier.issn2147-2653
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84979581716
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage88
dc.identifier.trdizinid208181
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tod.72692
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/208181
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/26285
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000393320300004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Yayincilik
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Osteoporoz Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectPsoriasis
dc.subjectpsoriatic arthritis
dc.subjectradiographic finding
dc.titlePsoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients: Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Features
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar