Comparison of two different laparoscopic hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGol, Mert
dc.contributor.authorKizilyar, Aysen
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T21:21:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T21:21:15Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH). Methods: Both types of hysterectomy were performed by retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing using LigaSure (TM) by four-puncture. A total of 45 patients were operated on by LH and 22 by TLH. The mean operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, drop in hemoglobin concentration, weight of removed uterus, major and minor per-post operative complications, and rate of conversion to the classical abdominal approach in the two groups were compared. Results: The mean operation time in TLH (110 min.) was significantly longer than in (65 min.). This was mainly due to the shorter mean operating time in the vaginal part of LH group (13 min.) compared to laparoscopic dissection of uterosacral ligaments and vaginal suturing (42 min.) in the TLH group. Median blood loss was also significantly higher in the group (278 ml.) compared to the LH group (110 ml.). There were no significant differences in the mean drop of hemoglobin concentration, uterine weight, major and minor complications and conversion to laparotomy between the groups. Conclusion: TLH seems to he a faster and more demanding method than With its shorter operation time and less bleeding, TLH may be preferred to TLH.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/jtgga.2010.39
dc.identifier.endpage211
dc.identifier.issn1309-0399
dc.identifier.issn1309-0380
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid24591938
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79251581924
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage208
dc.identifier.trdizinid115695
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2010.39
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/115695
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/28861
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000420635500008
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Yayincilik
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of The Turkish-German Gynecological Association
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjecthysterectomy
dc.subjectlaparoscopic hysterectomy
dc.subjecttotal laparoscopic hysterectomy
dc.titleComparison of two different laparoscopic hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy
dc.title.alternativeFarklı iki laparoskopik histerektomi tekni?inin karşılaştırılması: Laparoskopik histerektomi ve total laparoskopik histerektomi
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu