Clinical Evaluation of Complications for Single Visit Class III and Class V Restorations at the First Recall Appointment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3116-2016
dc.authorid0000-0003-3121-360X
dc.authorid0000-0001-7167-6946
dc.authorid0009-0009-0016-9360
dc.authorid0000-0001-6360-9436
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Bengu Dogu
dc.contributor.authorKorkut, Bora
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ezgi Kizil
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Elif
dc.contributor.authorAtali, Pinar Yilmaz
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T12:00:05Z
dc.date.available2026-02-03T12:00:05Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Clinical evaluation of senior students' Class III and Class V restorations at the first recall (control) appointment, regarding revised FDI criteria. Methods: Seventy-six anterior Class III and V restorations were assessed. A nano-ceramic, simplyshade composite (NeoSpectra-ST, Dentsply) was used. Restorative procedures were checked and approved by an experienced (3 years) restorative dentistry instructor. The first recall (control) appointment was scheduled 1 week after the restorations and a restorative instructor re-evaluated the restorations based on the biological, functional, and esthetic aspects of revised FDI criteria. Results: Significantly greater scores were observed for Esthetic criteria compared to Functional and Biological criteria (p<.001). Six failures were detected forform and contour, two for surface luster and texture, two for marginal staining, and two for color match. Onlyfortheform and contour criteria, Class V restorations obtained significantly higher scores than Class III (p=.033). Conclusion: Although anterior composite restorations were approved by an experienced instructor, various irreversible complications were observed at the first recall. Following the restorative procedure, a control appointment shortly is considered mandatory. The highest risk for failure was detected for Esthetic criteria. Class III restorations are considered more prone to failures compared to Class V.
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1615250
dc.identifier.endpage420
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage409
dc.identifier.trdizinid1322249
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1615250
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1322249
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/34510
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001526856000025
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, Inst Health Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Health Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20260130
dc.subjectResin composite
dc.subjectrecall
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.subjectclass III
dc.subjectclass V
dc.subjectrecall
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.subjectclass III
dc.subjectclass V
dc.titleClinical Evaluation of Complications for Single Visit Class III and Class V Restorations at the First Recall Appointment
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu