The Effects of Two Methods on Venipuncture Pain in Children: Procedural Restraint and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAytekin Ozdemir, Aynur/0000-0002-4738-0747
dc.authoridyilmaz kurt, fatma/0000-0001-9647-6764
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Fatma Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Aynur Aytekin
dc.contributor.authorAtay, Selma
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:44:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:44:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Invasive interventions can produce fear, anxiety, and pain in children. This may negatively affect the children's treatment and care. Aim: This study was conducted to determine the effects of procedural restraint (PR) and cognitive behavioral intervention package (CBIP) on venipuncture pain in children between 6-12 years of age. Design: Quasi-experimental study. Settings: The study was conducted in the pediatric blood collection service of the hospital in Turkey between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2016. Participants/Subjects: The population of the study consisted of children admitted to the blood collection service during the study period who met the inclusion criteria. Methods: The children included in the study were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n 1/4 31) received PR in accordance with routine clinical practice. Group 2 (n 1/4 30) received the CBIP. The data were collected by the researchers using a questionnaire, the visual analog scale (VAS), and the Wong-Baker FACES (WBFACES) Pain Rating Scale. Results: The children in the PR group had a mean VAS score of 5.90 3.22 and a mean WB-FACES score of 8.70 2.22. The children in the CBIP group had a mean VAS score of 2.43 +/- 2.02 and a mean WB-FACES score of 2.80 +/- 2.49. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean VAS and WBFACES pain scores of the groups (p < .05). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the children in the CBIP group had a lower pain level during venipuncture compared to those restrained for the procedure. (c) 2019 American Society for Pain Management Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pmn.2019.09.002
dc.identifier.endpage600
dc.identifier.issn1524-9042
dc.identifier.issn1532-8635
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid31628067
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85073524808
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage594
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2019.09.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24490
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000597348700018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPain Management Nursing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectMedical Procedures
dc.subjectPhysical Restraints
dc.subjectGeneral-Anesthesia
dc.subjectDistress
dc.subjectDistraction
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.titleThe Effects of Two Methods on Venipuncture Pain in Children: Procedural Restraint and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Package
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu