Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and a Microhybrid Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-9103-0069en_US
dc.authorscopusid57195458910en_US
dc.authorwosidAAG-1463-2021en_US
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Emine Şirin
dc.contributor.authorBal, Fatma Aytaç
dc.contributor.authorBuldur, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAltan, Halenur
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T11:40:14Z
dc.date.available2023-07-24T11:40:14Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two bulk-fill composite resins in Class II cavities for up to twenty-four months. Materials and Methods: In total 75 Class II restorations were made in 25 patients using two nanohybrid bulk-fill resin composites and a microhybrid composite. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months, using U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The restoration groups were compared using the Pearson chi-square test, and the Cochran Q-test was used to compare the changes across different time points within restorative materials (p<0.05). Results: Two patients who did not attend the appointments were excluded from the study, so 23 patients were evaluated with a 92% recall rate; at the end of the two-year follow-up, 66 restorations were evaluated. Three restorations underwent endodontic treatment and were deemed failures. The overall success rate was 96%. There were statistically significant differences between the three restorative resins in terms of color match parameter (p[removed]0.05). Conclusions: During the two-year follow-up period, the three composite resins showed similar clinical performance except for the color match parameter.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaraarslan, E. S., Bal, F. A., Buldur, M., & Altan, H. (2021). Twenty-four-month clinical comparison of two bulk-fill and a microhybrid composite restorations in class II cavities. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 29(4), 231-240. doi:10.1922/EJPRD_2189Karaaslan10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1922/EJPRD_2189Karaaslan10
dc.identifier.endpage240en_US
dc.identifier.issn0965-7452
dc.identifier.issn2396-8893
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33599405
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122487865
dc.identifier.startpage231en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2189Karaaslan10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/4421
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000724730600005
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorBuldur, Mehmet
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDennis Barber Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBulk-Fillen_US
dc.subjectClass IIen_US
dc.subjectClinical Studyen_US
dc.subjectResin-Based Compositeen_US
dc.subjectUSPHS Criteriaen_US
dc.titleTwenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and a Microhybrid Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayın Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu