Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES plus T), Turkish version
dc.authorid | yilmaz kurt, fatma/0000-0001-9647-6764 | |
dc.contributor.author | Atay, Selma | |
dc.contributor.author | Kurt, Fatma Yilmaz | |
dc.contributor.author | Aslan, Gulbahar Korkmaz | |
dc.contributor.author | Saarikoski, Mikko | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Hilal | |
dc.contributor.author | Ekincr, Volkan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-27T21:00:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-27T21:00:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.department | Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: A methodological type of study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale of the clinical learning environment of students, clinical nurses, and educators. Methods: Sample was comprised of 602 Turkish nursing students with clinical practice experience at the hospital. The CLES+T, developed by Saarikoski, was used for data collection. Language equivalency, internal consistency, item-total correlation, and structure validity were conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability study on the CLES +T scale. Results: It was determined that item-total correlations of four items were lower than 0.30, and those items were removed from the scale as a result of item analysis. The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.93-0.99; item total point correlations of the scale varied between 0.45 and 0.66; six factors were identified in the CLES+T factor analysis study, with a total variance explained by these six factors of 64%. Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, the CLES+T Turkish version was found to be a valid and reliable scale, which can be used to evaluate satisfaction of nursing students with their clinical education in Turkey. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/1518-8345.2413.3037 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1518-8345 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30208159 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85055846841 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2413.3037 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/27003 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000444484900001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Univ Sao Paulo, Escola De Enfermagem De Ribeirao Preto | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20250125 | |
dc.subject | Nursing Student | |
dc.subject | Clinical Environment | |
dc.subject | Scale | |
dc.subject | Satisfaction | |
dc.subject | Validity | |
dc.subject | Reliability | |
dc.title | Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES plus T), Turkish version | |
dc.type | Article |