Comparison of individuals consuming natural spring water and tap water in terms of urinary tract stone disease

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAkbas, Alpaslan/0000-0003-1470-5952
dc.authoridgulpinar, murat tolga/0000-0001-9420-3009
dc.authoridArslan, Muhammet/0000-0001-5565-0770
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Eylem Burcu
dc.contributor.authorGulpinar, Murat Tolga
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Gurhan
dc.contributor.authorSancak, Eyup Burak
dc.contributor.authorAkbas, Alpaslan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T21:19:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T21:19:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare individuals consuming natural spring water and tap water in terms of presence of urinary tract stone disease. Patients and methods: Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the type of water: tap water (Group I) vs natural spring water consumers (Group II). The two groups were compared in terms of presence of urolithiasis. In addition to the type of water consumed, participants were investigated in terms of age, sex, occupation, body mass index (BMI) and presence of hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus in order to evaluate if they constituted a risk factor for urolithiasis. Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients consuming tap water and 254 consuming natural spring water were included in this study. Presence of urinary stone disease was determined in 27% of patients in Group I and 26% of Group II (p = 0.794). At multivariate analysis involving all variables that might be correlated with the presence of urolithiasis; male gender, high BMI and presence of HT emerged as being significantly associated with urolithiasis. Conclusions: Although we showed that male gender, presence of HT and high BMI affect stone formation, no difference was demonstated in terms of presence of stone among patients consuming tap or natural spring water
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/aiua.2014.3.217
dc.identifier.endpage218
dc.identifier.issn1124-3562
dc.identifier.issn2282-4197
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid25308589
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84929470513
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage217
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2014.3.217
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/28772
dc.identifier.volume86
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000440256100014
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPagepress Publ
dc.relation.ispartofArchivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectTap water
dc.subjectNatural spring water
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectUrolithiasis
dc.titleComparison of individuals consuming natural spring water and tap water in terms of urinary tract stone disease
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu