Which Test is More Reliable for The Testing Statistical Significance of Canonical Correlation Coefficients?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaşer, Eyüp
dc.contributor.authorYiğit, Soner
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T19:33:05Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T19:33:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this study, Wilks’ ? (W), Hotelling-Lawley Trace (H) andPillai’s Trace (P) tests which are used in testing of statisticallysignificance for canonical correlation coefficients werecompared in terms of actual type I error rate. As a result of10000 simulation experiments conducted, when samples weretaken from multivariate distributions which are normal anddeviate slightly or moderately from normality, the W test wasconservative in terms of protecting actual type I error rate inall cases. However, when there is excessively deviate fromnormality, actual type I error rates for the W test exceededthe upper limit of Bradley’s criterion (4.50-5.50%) almost inall cases. On the other hand, the H test and P test generallyobtained actual type I error rates which were outside Bradleylimits.
dc.identifier.doi10.33724/zm.948879
dc.identifier.endpage100
dc.identifier.issn1301-0891
dc.identifier.issn2651-4494
dc.identifier.issue372
dc.identifier.startpage92
dc.identifier.trdizinid434648
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33724/zm.948879
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/434648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/16566
dc.identifier.volume0
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofZiraat Mühendisliği
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TRD_20250125
dc.subjectİstatistik ve Olasılık
dc.titleWhich Test is More Reliable for The Testing Statistical Significance of Canonical Correlation Coefficients?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu