Which Test is More Reliable for The Testing Statistical Significance of Canonical Correlation Coefficients?
[ X ]
Tarih
2021
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
In this study, Wilks’ ? (W), Hotelling-Lawley Trace (H) andPillai’s Trace (P) tests which are used in testing of statisticallysignificance for canonical correlation coefficients werecompared in terms of actual type I error rate. As a result of10000 simulation experiments conducted, when samples weretaken from multivariate distributions which are normal anddeviate slightly or moderately from normality, the W test wasconservative in terms of protecting actual type I error rate inall cases. However, when there is excessively deviate fromnormality, actual type I error rates for the W test exceededthe upper limit of Bradley’s criterion (4.50-5.50%) almost inall cases. On the other hand, the H test and P test generallyobtained actual type I error rates which were outside Bradleylimits.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
İstatistik ve Olasılık
Kaynak
Ziraat Mühendisliği
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
0
Sayı
372
