Evaluation with Decision Trees of Efficacy and Safety of Semirigid Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Calculi

dc.authoridYucebas, Sait Can/0000-0002-1030-3545
dc.authoridKilinc, Muhammet Fatih/0000-0002-2515-7106
dc.contributor.authorSancak, Eyup Burak
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Muhammet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorYucebas, Sait Can
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:43:37Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:43:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The decision on the choice of proximal ureteral stone therapy depends on many factors, and sometimes urologists have difficulty in choosing the treatment option. This study is aimed at evaluating the factors affecting the success of semirigid ureterorenoscopy (URS) using the decision tree method. Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to November 2015, the data of consecutive patients treated for proximal ureteral stone were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 920 patients with proximal ureteral stone treated with semirigid URS were included in the study. All statistically significant attributes were tested using the decision tree method. Results: The model created using decision tree had a sensitivity of 0.993 and an accuracy of 0.857. While URS treatment was successful in 752 patients (81.7%), it was unsuccessful in 168 patients (18.3%). According to the decision tree method, the most important factor affecting the success of URS is whether the stone is impacted to the ureteral wall. The second most important factor affecting treatment was intramural stricture requiring dilatation if the stone is impacted, and the size of the stone if not impacted. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the impacted stone, intramural stricture requiring dilatation and stone size may have a significant effect on the success rate of semirigid URS for proximal ureteral stone. Further studies with population-based and longitudinal design should be conducted to confirm this finding. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000474954
dc.identifier.endpage325
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.issn1423-0399
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid28472804
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018710470
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage320
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000474954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24297
dc.identifier.volume99
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413843700011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Internationalis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectDecision tree
dc.subjectFailed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
dc.subjectHolmium laser
dc.subjectImpacted stone
dc.subjectIntramural stricture
dc.subjectProximal ureteral stone
dc.titleEvaluation with Decision Trees of Efficacy and Safety of Semirigid Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Calculi
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar