Artificial nail modelling systems in healthcare workers: An emerging risk of contact sensitization to a well-known occupational allergen in an alternative way

dc.authoridKAYA, OZGE/0000-0001-8062-1664
dc.authoridKESKINKAYA, ZEYNEP/0000-0002-2982-3823
dc.contributor.authorKeskinkaya, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorMermutlu, Selda Isik
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Haile
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:24:43Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:24:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artificial nail modelling systems (ANMS) pose a significant risk for nail stylists and their clients regarding acrylate sensitization, which might jeopardize the use of acrylate-containing medical devices. Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of artificial nail practices among female healthcare workers (HCWs) compared with controls and assess ANMS-related side effects. Methods: In this comparative, cross-sectional, single-centre study, a face-to-face interview with 200 female HCWs and 200 age-matched female dermatology patients (controls) was conducted regarding the use of ANMS between March and November 2023. Results: Among 400 participants (median age: 25), 85 (21.3%) have applied ANMS at least once. The prevalence of ANMS application was significantly higher in HCWs (n = 54/200, 27%) compared with controls (n = 31/200, 15.5%) (p < 0.05). Long-lasting nail polish was the most commonly preferred technique (n = 82/85, 96.5%). ANMS were mainly performed in nail studios by nail stylists (n = 79/85, 92.9%), while three participants were using home kits. Nail brittleness was the most frequently reported side effect (n = 19/85, 22.4%). No case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was detected. Conclusions: The popularity of ANMS among young female HCWs is growing. This striking trend might further put these individuals not only at risk of medical device-related adverse events but also occupational ACD.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.14548
dc.identifier.endpage44
dc.identifier.issn0105-1873
dc.identifier.issn1600-0536
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid38561321
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189632742
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage38
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14548
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/22326
dc.identifier.volume91
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001194754000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofContact Dermatitis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subject2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
dc.subjectacrylates
dc.subjectallergic contact dermatitis
dc.subjectartificial nail modelling systems
dc.subjecthealthcare worker
dc.subjectlong-lasting nail polish
dc.subjectoccupational
dc.titleArtificial nail modelling systems in healthcare workers: An emerging risk of contact sensitization to a well-known occupational allergen in an alternative way
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar