Comparison of Urodynamics Parameters with Intrafascial or Extrafascial Hysterectomy Techniques

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid10243629400en_US
dc.authorwosidB-1402-2012en_US
dc.contributor.authorErin, Recep
dc.contributor.authorÜnsal, Mesut Abdulkerim
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Süleyman
dc.contributor.authorAran, Turhan
dc.contributor.authorBozkaya, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T10:46:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T10:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare urodynamics parameters at pre-and postoperative periods in patients undergoing intrafascial or extrafascial abdominal hysterectomy. Background: Hysterectomy carries the risk of damage to the pelvic splanchnic nerve, which leads to the development of urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: Women scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to intrafascial (n = 24) and extrafascial (n = 27). All of the 10 urodynamics parameters investigated in the two techniques at pre-and postoperative periods were compared. p < 0.05 was chosen to represent the statistical significance for each of the variables. Results: We observed by urodynamics investigation at preoperative and sixth month postoperative periods no urinary incontinence in patients subjected to intrafascial or extrafascial total abdominal hysterectomy. There was no difference between the two techniques with respect to maximum detrussor pressure, maximum abdominal pressure, strong micturition requirement, vesical compliance, detrusor compliance, maximum vesical pressure, first sensation of bladder filling, first desire to void, and strong desire to void (p > 0.05). Maximum bladder capacity in the intrafascial technique was significantly higher than in the extrafascial technique (p < 0.05). Conclusion: No significant relationship was found between the two groups with respect to increase of stress or urge urinary incontinence symptoms and subsequent incontinence after hysterectomy.en_US
dc.identifier.citationErin, R., Ünsal, M. A., Güven, S., Aran, T., & Bozkaya, H. (2021). Comparison of Urodynamics Parameters with Intrafascial or Extrafascial Hysterectomy Techniques. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 37(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2020.0026en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/gyn.2020.0026en_US
dc.identifier.endpage143en_US
dc.identifier.issn1042-4067 / 1557-7724
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103724595en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage139en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2020.0026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/29543
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000592658400001en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorÜnsal, Mesut Abdulkerim
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-2766-5999
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Gynecologic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectExtrafascialen_US
dc.subjectHysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectIncontinenceen_US
dc.subjectIntrafascialen_US
dc.subjectUrodynamicsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Urodynamics Parameters with Intrafascial or Extrafascial Hysterectomy Techniquesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Mesut Abdulkerim Unsal_Makale.pdf
Boyut:
75.1 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Araştırma Makalesi
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.21 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu