Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different fiber post and core systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOzyurek, Taha/0000-0003-3299-3361
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorTopkara, Can
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Imran
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Koray
dc.contributor.authorGundogar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gulsah
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:41:00Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different post and core systems, CAD/CAM crown placement on fracture strength of endodontically treated mandibular premolar teeth. One hundred forty single-rooted premolar teeth were randomly divided into a control group and six experimental groups as follows: control group (Group 1); FiberSite post luting with Clearfil DC Core Plus (Group 2); RelyX Fiber post luting and core build up with Clearfil DC Core Plus (Group 3); RelyX Fiber post luting with Clearfil DC Core Plus and core build up with Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (Group 4); specimens that received CAD/CAM crowns after the same procedures performed in Groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively (Groups 5, 6, and 7). Fracture strength tests were performed, and the failure modes were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. The highest fracture resistance was observed in the control group and among the experimental groups in Group 4. Groups 3 and 5 showed similar fracture resistance followed by Group 2. The lowest fracture resistances were seen in the samples of Groups 6 and 7. While the fracture strength of Group 2 increased after the crown placement (Group 5), the fracture strength of Group 3 and Group 4 decreased (P < 0.05). While the specimens in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 predominantly showed favorable failure, unfavorable failure was more frequent in Groups 5, 6, and 7.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10266-020-00481-4
dc.identifier.endpage595
dc.identifier.issn1618-1247
dc.identifier.issn1618-1255
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid31950378
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078067185
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage588
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00481-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/23958
dc.identifier.volume108
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000507686500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofOdontology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectMandibular premolar
dc.subjectEndodontically treated teeth
dc.subjectFiber post
dc.subjectCAD
dc.subjectCAM
dc.subjectFracture resistance
dc.titleFracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different fiber post and core systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu