Estimating the brittleness values of carbonated rocks with Shore, Schmidt, and Leeb hardness values

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridEKINCIOGLU, GOKHAN/0000-0001-9377-6817
dc.authoridAkbay, Deniz/0000-0002-7794-5278
dc.contributor.authorAkbay, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorEkincioglu, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:41:05Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThere is not a defined standard method for determining the brittleness of rocks. Prediction of rock brittleness using rebound based hardness test methods is widely used in the characterization of rocks because they are non-destructive, inexpensive, and easy to apply. Rock surface hardness can also be used to predict the physical and mechanical properties of rocks. In this study, hardness values of 12 different carbonated rocks were determined on the same specimens using 3 different methods. C-2 type Shore Scleroscope, L-type Schmidt hammer, and Leeb hardness test device are rebound based hardness tests. The aim of the study is to determine the most suitable rebound hardness test method, that can be used to estimate the four different brittleness values recommended, by considering the compressive and tensile strength values in the literature. Relationships between the hardness values obtained using three different test methods and four different brittleness values were analyzed. It was observed that each method can be interchangeable. It was determined that the rebound based hardness tests could be used in predicting two of the four different brittleness values, which are widely used in the literature but cannot be used in estimating the other two. The strongest relationships were obtained from Leeb hardness values, followed by Shore hardness values and Schmidt hardness values, respectively. The best method to estimate the two brittleness indexes of rocks was determined as Leeb hardness. Besides, Shore hardness and Schmidt hardness methods also had strong relationships between the two brittleness indexes.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12665-022-10332-w
dc.identifier.issn1866-6280
dc.identifier.issn1866-6299
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127256756
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10332-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24011
dc.identifier.volume81
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000772954400002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Earth Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectShore hardness
dc.subjectSchmidt hardness
dc.subjectLeeb hardness
dc.subjectRock brittleness
dc.subjectCompressive strength
dc.subjectTensile strength
dc.titleEstimating the brittleness values of carbonated rocks with Shore, Schmidt, and Leeb hardness values
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu