The Impact of Preoperative JJ Stent Diameter on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A RIRSearch Group Study

dc.authorid0000-0002-0107-5843
dc.authorid0000-0001-7577-7955
dc.authorid0000-0003-0540-2693
dc.authorid0000-0001-6187-1940
dc.authorid0000-0001-6140-5181
dc.authorid0000-0003-2499-8947
dc.authorid0000-0002-0926-3005
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Mehmet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorOzman, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorTeke, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorSimsekoglu, Muhammet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorAkgul, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBasatac, Cem
dc.contributor.authorCinar, Onder
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T12:00:35Z
dc.date.available2026-02-03T12:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: A JJ stent placed before retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may passively dilate the ureter and facilitate ureteral access sheath (UAS) implantation. No studies have examined the significance of preoperative JJ stent diameter, even though numerous studies have shown that UAS insertion is simpler in patients with them. Our study examines the relationship between preoperative ureteral stent caliber and UAS placement and RIRS results. Materials and Methods: A total of 655 patients with known preoperative double-J stent size before RIRS were analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups based on their preoperative stent diameter (Group 1: 4.8 Fr and Group 2: 6 Fr). Demographic and clinical data of the patients, stone characteristics, surgical data, perioperative and postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were analyzed for comparison. Results: The groups contained 323 and 332 patients. The demographic data of the two groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between SFR, UAS insertion rate, hospitalization time, and complications. The success rate of placing a UAS with a higher caliber was statistically significantly higher in those with a 6 Fr JJ stent than in those with a 4.8 Fr stent (P = .001). The operation time was also shorter in the group with a thicker stent (P = .003). Conclusions: Our data suggest that while the preoperative JJ stent diameter does not significantly affect overall UAS insertion success, complication rates, or postoperative stone-free status, using a 6 Fr stent facilitates the placement of larger UAS calibers and may decrease operation time. Consequently, although both stent diameters are efficacious, selecting a 6 Fr stent may provide procedural benefits without jeopardizing safety or results.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10926429251377021
dc.identifier.endpage797
dc.identifier.issn1092-6429
dc.identifier.issn1557-9034
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.pmid40929028
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105015798543
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage792
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251377021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/34650
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001570463400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20260130
dc.subjectretrograde intrarenal surgery
dc.subjectpreoperative JJ stent
dc.subjectdiameter
dc.subjectureteral access sheath
dc.titleThe Impact of Preoperative JJ Stent Diameter on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A RIRSearch Group Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar