Assessment of Cervicovaginal Smear and HPV DNA Co-Test for Cervical Cancer Screening: Implications for Diagnosis and Follow-Up Strategies
dc.authorid | Kaya Terzi, Neslihan/0000-0001-8184-4691 | |
dc.contributor.author | Terzi, Neslihan Kaya | |
dc.contributor.author | Yulek, Ozden | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-27T20:14:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-27T20:14:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.department | Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Cervical cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitating effective screening and diagnostic methods. This study aimed to assess the performance of cervicovaginal smear (CVS) and human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA co-test. Study design: The pathology results of 225 female patients who underwent HPV-DNA testing with CVS between 2014 and 2022 and were subsequently diagnosed by colposcopic cervical biopsy or second CVS were retrospectively analyzed. Results: CVS samples showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and cervical cancer. Concordance between the first and second diagnoses demonstrated moderate agreement for LSIL. ASCUS cases exhibited a significant correlation with HPV-DNA positivity and higher-grade cervical lesions. In biopsy, sensitivity and specificity for CIN1/LSIL were 87.5% and 53.3, respectively, while for CIN2-3/HSIL, they were 83.87% and 58.49%. HPV testing showed significant correlation with histopathologic results. In women over 40 years, more intraepithelial lesions were diagnosed compared to younger women (p < 0.005). The conventional smear technique proved reliable in detecting high-grade lesions. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of our study, our results emphasize the value of HPV-DNA testing to avoid unnecessary interventions and to establish appropriate follow-up strategies. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/diagnostics14060611 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4418 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38535031 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85188733649 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060611 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/21199 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001191938000001 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Mdpi | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Diagnostics | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20250125 | |
dc.subject | cervical cancer screening | |
dc.subject | colposcopy | |
dc.subject | conventional smear | |
dc.subject | liquid-based cytology | |
dc.subject | HPV | |
dc.title | Assessment of Cervicovaginal Smear and HPV DNA Co-Test for Cervical Cancer Screening: Implications for Diagnosis and Follow-Up Strategies | |
dc.type | Article |