Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoriduzun, metehan/0000-0003-1406-5473
dc.contributor.authorToman, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorErbas, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorKiraz, Hasan Ali
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Metehan
dc.contributor.authorOvali, Mehmet Akif
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:41:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:41:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we aimed to compare the effects of various airway devices on QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly separated into four groups: Group ETT, Group LMA, Group PLA, Group V-gel. Baseline values and hearth rate, mean arterial pressure and ECG was obtained at the 1st, 5th and 30th minutes after administration of anesthesia and placement of airway device and, QTc interval was evaluated. Difference was observed between ET group and V-gel group in the 5th minute mean arterial pressure values (p < 0.05). It was observed that QTc intervals at the 1st and 5th minute in the ET group significantly increased when compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Again, it was observed that QTc interval of ET group at the 15th and 30th minute was longer when compared with PLA and V-gel groups (p < 0.05). It was also observed that QTc interval of LMA Group at the 5th minute after intubation significantly increased when compared with V-gel group (p < 0.05). It was observed that HR values of ETT group at the 1st, 5th and 15th minutes after intubation increased with regards to PLA and V-gel groups (p < 0.05). It was determined that the 30th minute hearth rate of ETT group was higher when compared to V-gel group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In our study we observed that V-gel Rabbit affected both hemodynamic response and QT interval less than other airway devices.
dc.description.sponsorshipCanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Project Found [TSA-2013-80]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Project Found with TSA-2013-80 project number. The authors has no financial relationship with the companies that manufactured the materials used in this study.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x
dc.identifier.endpage732
dc.identifier.issn1387-1307
dc.identifier.issn1573-2614
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid25637244
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84945456498
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage727
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9659-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24130
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000363554100009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectEndotracheal intubation
dc.subjectLaryngeal mask airway
dc.subjectCobra PLA
dc.subjectV-gel Rabbit
dc.subjectSupraglottic airway
dc.subjectQTc
dc.subjectHemodynamic response
dc.titleComparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu