The Effects of Different Types of Nasal Packing on Odor Function and Mucociliary Function After Septum Surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCaglar Cil, ozge/0000-0001-8737-2891
dc.contributor.authorCaglar, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorGuclu, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorOymak, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorDerekoy, Sefa
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:54:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:54:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, we evaluated how the Merocel and nasal splint packing placed in the nose after septoplasty surgery affects the olfactory and mucociliary functions of the nose in the early period, and compared the 2 packing with each other. Material and Method: The study included 60 patients with isolated septal deviation and 30 patients in the control group. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Nasal splint was inserted after septoplasty in group A (n = 30). Merocel was inserted in group B (n = 30). The Sniffin sticks test and saccharin test were applied to the patients before surgery and 15 days after the surgery. The same tests were applied to the control group consisting of 30 patients and the results were compared. Results: No complications, such as postoperative bleeding, submucoperichondrial hematoma, or abscess formation, were found in both groups. Mucociliary function was improved after septoplasty, and it was statistically significant, but there was no statistically significant difference between both packing groups. A statistically significant difference was found for the odor test in patients who used nasal splint packing in comparison with patients who used Merocel in the early period. Conclusion: The odor test showed significant differences between the 2 groups and this was statistically significant in the early period. Mucociliary function was better after surgery, but there was no statistical difference in the different nasal packing groups.
dc.description.sponsorshipBAP (scientific research project) of the university
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Received financial support from BAP (scientific research project) of the university.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0145561319843074
dc.identifier.endpage489
dc.identifier.issn0145-5613
dc.identifier.issn1942-7522
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid31032654
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065247329
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage486
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319843074
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/26023
dc.identifier.volume98
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000490951400011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Inc
dc.relation.ispartofEnt-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectMerocel
dc.subjectnasal splint
dc.subjectodor function
dc.subjectmucociliary function
dc.titleThe Effects of Different Types of Nasal Packing on Odor Function and Mucociliary Function After Septum Surgery
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Ozge Caglar_Makale.pdf
Boyut:
177.89 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu