Analyzing central-line associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in 22 countries: The results of ID-IRI survey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridHassan, Abdullahi Nur/0000-0001-8906-290X
dc.authoridRahimi, Bilal Ahmad/0000-0002-6630-5742
dc.authoridSantos, Lurdes/0000-0002-0622-6823
dc.authoridErdem, Hakan/0000-0002-6265-5227
dc.authoridboncuoglu, elif/0000-0002-3521-0484
dc.authoriddevrim, ilker/0000-0002-6053-8027
dc.authoridHakamifard, Atousa/0000-0001-9456-2239
dc.contributor.authorDevrim, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorEl-Kholy, Amani
dc.contributor.authorAlmohaizeie, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorLogar, Mateja
dc.contributor.authorRahimi, Bilal Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorAmer, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:39:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: Because central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant complication of central venous access, it is critical to prevent CLABSIs through the use of central line bundles. The purpose of this study was to take a snapshot of central venous access bundles in various countries. Methods: The participants in intensive care units (ICUs) completed a questionnaire that included information about the health center, infection control procedures, and central line maintenance. The countries were divided into 2 groups: those with a low or low-middle income and those with an upper-middle or high income. Results: Forty-three participants from 22 countries (46 hospitals, 85 ICUs) responded to the survey. Eight (17.4%) hospitals had no surveillance system for CLABSI. Approximately 7.1 % (n = 6) ICUs had no CLABSI bun-dle. Twenty ICUs (23.5%) had no dedicated checklist. The percentage of using ultrasonography during cathe-ter insertion, transparent semi-permeable dressings, needleless connectors and single-use sterile pre-filled ready to use 0.9% NaCl were significantly higher in countries with higher and middle-higher income (P < .05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that there are significant differences in the central line bundles between low/low-middle income countries and upper-middle/high-income countries. Additional measures should be taken to address inequity in the management of vascular access in resource-limited countries. (c) 2022 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.031
dc.identifier.endpage1332
dc.identifier.issn0196-6553
dc.identifier.issn1527-3296
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.pmid35263612
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127358025
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1327
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/23885
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000925384100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Infection Control
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectCLABSI
dc.subjectCentral line
dc.subjectBundle
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subjectCatheter
dc.subjectInfection
dc.titleAnalyzing central-line associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in 22 countries: The results of ID-IRI survey
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu