Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCelik Guler, Ozge/0000-0003-3276-2408
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ozge Celik
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T21:03:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T21:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 3 different fixed or removable functional appliances on the soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion using 3-dimensional images. Methods: A total of 60 patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion (38 girls and 22 boys; mean age, 12.35 +/- 1.01 years) were treated with 3 different functional appliances, namely, Twin-block (TB) (group TB, n = 20), mono-block (MB) (group MB, n = 20), or Herbst (H) (group H, n = 20) for 9.55 +/- 1.46 months. Three-dimensional photographs of each patient were taken at the baseline and the end of the therapy with a 3dMD Face system (3dMD, Atlanta, Ga). Statistical analyses were performed using the dependent samples t test, 1-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: No statistically significant differences were detected for soft tissue changes except for the lower facial width found, at least in group H (P <0.05). Volumetric differences in the mandible were similar between the groups (P >0.05). A statistically significant decrease in total facial height and an increase in convexity angle and facial depth were detected in all groups after treatment compared with the baseline (P <0.05). The upper and lower facial height, lower lip height, and nasal width were statistically significantly increased in the TB and MB groups after treatment compared with the baseline (P <0.05) and similar to those in group H (P >0.05). Conclusions: TB, MB, and H appliances may promote the facial soft tissue profile, including volumetric improvement, in the mandibular region.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.020
dc.identifier.endpage526
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid32988567
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091802166
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage518
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/27476
dc.identifier.volume158
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000580585300020
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectTwin-Block Appliance
dc.subjectOrthodontic Treatment
dc.subjectHerbst Appliances
dc.subjectMalocclusion
dc.subjectSkeletal
dc.titleComparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu