Does three-dimensional prenatal ultrasound necerrasy: pregnant women's point of view

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCelik, Fatih/0000-0001-5599-6093
dc.contributor.authorKoken, Gulengul
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Ayse Nur Cakir
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Gonca
dc.contributor.authorUnlu, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorArioz, Dagistan
dc.contributor.authorYilmazer, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:29:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The role and applicability of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) in perinatology has been repeatedly discussed in the literature. Regardless, our knowledge about patient expectations remains limited. We aimed at determining the expectations, perception and knowledge of pregnant women about 3D-US. Material and Methods: Upon admission to the labor unit, the women filled out a questionnaire, with the help of a doctor, investigating sociodemographic data, pregnancy and delivery history previous experiences and expectations for US imaging. Results: A total of 644 pregnant women were included in the study Respondents declared that approximately 70% of all kinds of structural abnormalities could be detected by 3D-US and estimated its reliabilityat nearly 70%. While 60% of the participants underwent 3D-US, 70% of them believed that every pregnant woman should undergo such test. Also, 457 (70.9%) of the participants were of the opinion that every pregnant woman must undergo 3D-US imaging, whereas 173 (26.8%) did not think 3D-US imaging was necessary Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this has been the first study on patient opinions regarding the need for 3D-US imaging during pregnancy Although the participants were not certain about the harmful effects of 3D-US, the majority believed that it was necessary for every pregnant woman to undergo such testing. Obviously patients must be instructed on the limitations of US imaging before the examination to clarify any misunderstandings about the possibilities such a technique may offer.
dc.identifier.endpage36
dc.identifier.issn0017-0011
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid24505961
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84896828475
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage31
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/22931
dc.identifier.volume85
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000330260600006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherVia Medica
dc.relation.ispartofGinekologia Polska
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectthree-dimensional ultrasound
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectprenatal diagnosis
dc.titleDoes three-dimensional prenatal ultrasound necerrasy: pregnant women's point of view
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu