Evaluating the Impact of Different Education Methods on Cleft Lip and Palate Anatomy Training

dc.authoridDuran, Gökhan Serhat / 0000-0001-6152-6178
dc.contributor.authorDalgalı, Perihan
dc.contributor.authorTopsakal, Kübra Gülnur
dc.contributor.authorMısır, Selcen Eser
dc.contributor.authorErgüven, Sara Samur
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Gökhan Serhat
dc.contributor.authorGörgülü, Serkan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:43:38Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:43:38Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the effects of different educational methods on short and long-term learning outcomes and to investigate the satisfaction and perception of cleft lip and palate (CLP) education among dental students.Design The theoretical exam on CLP to determine their baseline level of knowledge was taken by the participants(T0). After the exam, the students were randomly divided into three groups and all students attended a lecture-based traditional education on CLP. Students in the first group (n = 40) received no additional teaching (Group A). Students in the second group (n = 38) received model teaching with 3D-printed models (Group B). The third group (n = 39) was trained in e-learning-supported education (Group C). The theoretical exam was repeated immediately after the education (T1/short-term learning), one week later (T2/early long-term learning), and one month later (T3/late long-term learning), and the effect of the education methods on information level was assessed. In addition, a post-training satisfaction questionnaire was administered to participants of Group B and Group C.Results Both 3D model-based and e-learning-supported approaches significantly improved immediate knowledge of CLP. However, no significant differences were found in knowledge retention over time between the all methods. A majority of students favored the incorporation of both methods in orthodontic education.Conclusions While both 3D models and e-learning effectively enhance short-term CLP knowledge among dental students, their long-term educational impacts are comparable. However, student preferences indicated that the use of 3D-printed models and e-learning strategies may be useful augmentations to traditional lecture education.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors confirmed that there is nothing to declare.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10556656241286754
dc.identifier.endpage1749
dc.identifier.issn1055-6656
dc.identifier.issn1545-1569
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.pmid39324208
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205570645
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1743
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241286754
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24305
dc.identifier.volume61
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001324001500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Inc
dc.relation.ispartofCleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectanatomy
dc.subjectcleft lip and palate
dc.subjectorthodontics
dc.titleEvaluating the Impact of Different Education Methods on Cleft Lip and Palate Anatomy Training
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
Gokhan Serhat Duran_Makale.pdf
Boyut:
1.18 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format