Comparison of Bicortical Headless Cannulated Screw Fixations, Tension Band Fixations, and Kirschner Wire Fixations of a Jones Fracture A Biomechanical Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Onur
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorKuru, Tolgahan
dc.contributor.authorBilge, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Berna
dc.contributor.authorKizilay, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorOlcar, Haci
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T02:58:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-29T02:58:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of study was to biomechanically compare the fixation of Jones fracture using headless cannulated screw, tension band, and two Kirschner wires.' Methods: A total of 60 fourth-generation, fifth metatarsal synthetic bone models were divided into three groups according to the fixation techniques. A vertical load, oriented from plantar to dorsal and lateral to medial, was applied to the metatarsal specimen that were potted with molding material. The stiffness and fatigue values were compared between the three fixation groups. Results: In the plantar to dorsal load test, the stiffness values were found to be significantly higher in Group 1 compared to the other groups (P = .034, P = .013). No significant difference was found in the analysis in terms of fatigue values in plantar to dorsal load testing (P = .348, P = .416). No significant difference was found between compression screw and tension band groups in lateral to medial loading test, in terms of stiffness and fatigue values (P = .096, P = .762). However, the stiffness values and fatigue values of these two groups were found to be statistically significantly higher than the Kirschner wire group (P = .003, P = .002, P = .016, P = .023). Conclusions: The result of this study showed that the bicortical fixation of headless compression screw provides a more stable fixation than other fixation methods, especially in plantar to dorsal loading. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 114(6), 2024; doi:10.7547/22-201)
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Coordination Unit [THD-2020-3177]; Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to acknowledge Menije Balyemez Y & imath;lmaz for her support in the statistical analysis. This work was supported by Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, The Scientific Research Coordination Unit, Project number: THD-2020-3177.
dc.identifier.issn8750-7315
dc.identifier.issn1930-8264
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217160849
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/30316
dc.identifier.volume114
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001420176800013
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmer Podiatric Med Assoc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250529
dc.subjectIntramedullary Screw
dc.subject5th-Metatarsal Bone
dc.subjectBase
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectTuberosity
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectRefracture
dc.subjectDistal
dc.subjectReturn
dc.subjectPlate
dc.titleComparison of Bicortical Headless Cannulated Screw Fixations, Tension Band Fixations, and Kirschner Wire Fixations of a Jones Fracture A Biomechanical Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu