The Effect of Suspension Training vs. Traditional Resistance Training in Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of traditional resistance training (RT) vs. suspension training (ST) on functional performance, body composition, and cognitive functions in older adults. Materials and Methods: Participants were categorized into three groups: the ST group (ST, n=8, age: 71), the traditional RT group (RT, n=8, age: 70), and the control group [(C), n=7, age: 70]. All measurements, assessments, and test evaluations were performed at the baseline, the sixth week, and the twelfth week. The training programs were conducted two days per week. The ST group was included in a program consisting of exercises with the suspension apparatus, whereas the RT focused on RT with body weight and free weights. The C was not included in the training program. Results: The arm strength was greater in the ST group than in the C group (p=0.007). Muscle mass (p=0.029), basal metabolic rate (BMR) (p=0.034), agility and dynamic balance (p=0.012), leg strength (p=0.005), arm strength (p=0.002), and cognitive function (p=0.006) were significantly different in the ST group compared to the C group (p<0.05). The balance (p=0.005) and BMR (p=0.030) were significantly improved in the ST group compared to the RT group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Physical therapists and trainers may use a suspension method as an alternative to traditional methods for older adults. This method may provide trainers with the opportunity to improve strength, balance, and cognitive function with a single training method.