The comparison of sectional damages in reinforced-concrete structures and seismic parameters on regional Basis; a case study from western Turkiye (Aegean Region)

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridISIK, Ercan/0000-0001-8057-065X
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorUlutas, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorBuyuksarac, Aydin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:53:56Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:53:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractTurkiye has made significant changes and updates in both seismic risk maps and design codes over time, as have other countries with high seismic risk. In this study, the last two seismic design codes and risk maps were compared for the Aegean Region (Western Turkiye) where the earthquake risk has once again emerged with the 2020 Izmir Earthquake (Mw=6.9). In this study, information about the seismicity of the Aegean Region was given. The seismic parameters for all provinces in the region were compared with the last two earthquake risk maps. The spectral acceleration coefficients of all provinces have increased and differentiated with the current seismic hazard map as a result of the design spectra used on a regional basis have been replaced by the geographical location-specific design spectra. In addition, section damage limits were obtained for all provinces within the scope of the last two seismic design codes. Structural analyses for a sample reinforced-concrete building were made separately for each province using pushover analysis. The deformations in the cross-sections were compared with the limit states corresponding to the damage levels specified in the last two seismic design codes for the region. Target displacement requests for all provinces have decreased with the current code. The differentiation of geographical location-specific design spectra both in the last two seismic design code and between provinces has caused changes in section damages and building performance levels. The main aim of this study is to obtain and compare both seismic and structural analysis results for all provinces in the Aegean Region (Western Turkiye).
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/eas.2023.24.1.037
dc.identifier.endpage51
dc.identifier.issn2092-7614
dc.identifier.issn2092-7622
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148210305
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage37
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.24.1.037
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/25910
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000961368300004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTechno-Press
dc.relation.ispartofEarthquakes and Structures
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectAegean Region
dc.subjectdesign spectra
dc.subjectpushover
dc.subjectseismic risk
dc.subjectwestern Turkiye
dc.titleThe comparison of sectional damages in reinforced-concrete structures and seismic parameters on regional Basis; a case study from western Turkiye (Aegean Region)
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu