A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AMBIVALENT AGEISM SCALE

dc.authoridTOSUN, LEMAN PINAR/0000-0003-1635-6629
dc.authoridOzturk, Ahu/0000-0003-0349-7342
dc.authoridKUSDIL, MUHARREM ERSIN/0000-0002-3005-9009
dc.authoridKablanoglu, Anil/0000-0002-5945-0116
dc.authoridKarlidag, Sercan/0000-0001-7160-1602
dc.authoridAlparslan, Kenan/0000-0001-6701-355X
dc.authoridCAVUSOGLU, MERVE/0000-0002-7295-0430
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Ahu
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Leman Pinar
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorCavusoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.authorAlparslan, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Dilan
dc.contributor.authorKarlidag, Sercan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, which measures 2 forms of ageism, namely benevolent and hostile ageism. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 222 adults through an online survey. Participants completed Turkish versions of the 13-item Ambivalent Ageism Scale and the Implicit Association Test adapted for ageism. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency and split-half consistency were also calculated. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating ambivalent ageism and its subscales with implicit ageism scores. Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis of 12-items confirmed the original structure by exhibiting a good fit to the data (goodness of fit index = 0.93, p <.001, comparative fit index = 0.97, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07). Internal consistency of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale and its 2 subscales were found to be satisfactory, with Cronbach's alpha being .89 for benevolent ageism (9 items), .79 for hostile ageism (3 items), and .89 for the total scale. Scale had a high split-half reliability coefficient (0.95). Implicit ageism positively correlated with ambivalent ageism (total score) and both benevolent ageism and hostile ageism (.22, .21, and .16, respectively). Except for cognitive assistance/protection, which was a sub-factor of benevolent ageism, no age and gender difference was found in any of the ageism scores. Conclusion: It was decided that the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale is a valid and reliable measure of negative attitudes toward older adults.
dc.identifier.doi10.31086/tjgeri.2020.192
dc.identifier.endpage545
dc.identifier.issn1304-2947
dc.identifier.issn1307-9948
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage534
dc.identifier.trdizinid458503
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31086/tjgeri.2020.192
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/458503
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/26479
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000605365100015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGunes Kitabevi Ltd Sti
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Geriatrics-Turk Geriatri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectAgeism
dc.subjectPrejudice
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.titleA VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AMBIVALENT AGEISM SCALE
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar