Comparison of clinical efficacy and patient acceptance of interdental brush and silicone coated interdental pick: a randomized split-mouth, prospective clinical trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridErcan, Ertugrul/0000-0003-0480-4738
dc.contributor.authorUstaoglu, Gulbahar
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Esra
dc.contributor.authorGumus, Kerem Caglar
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:49:30Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this split-mouth, prospective controlled study was to compare the effects of two different interdental devices on clinical plaque elimination, gingival bleeding and patient acceptance and comfort. Materials and methods Thirty participants who had been diagnosed with gingivitis were included in the study. After professional oral prophylaxis and a 3-day washout period, patients were advised to use two test devices (TePe Interdental Brushes Original and TePe EasyPick (TM), Malmo, Sweden) according to instructions. The plaque index (Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein Index) and bleeding index (Papillary Bleeding Index) were recorded at baseline and after 2 weeks. Patient satisfaction and comfort were assessed with a questionnaire. Results Both of the tested devices improved the plaque and bleeding index scores. There were no differences between the two sides in terms of time-dependent changes. The patients felt more satisfied with the cleansing capacity and more comfortable with the use of SCIP compared with IDB (p = 0.001). Pain sensation with the use of SCIP was significantly lower than with IDB (p = 0.002). Conclusion The clinical efficiency of the tested interdental devices was similar in terms of removing plaque and decreasing bleeding. However, SCIP were found to be more comfortable and preferable to IDB.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-020-03293-6
dc.identifier.endpage2127
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid32430775
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085036684
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2121
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03293-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/25193
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000534190200004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectDental plaque
dc.subjectGingival health
dc.subjectInterdental brush
dc.subjectOral hygiene
dc.subjectPatient compliance
dc.titleComparison of clinical efficacy and patient acceptance of interdental brush and silicone coated interdental pick: a randomized split-mouth, prospective clinical trial
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu