Competing paradigms: The dilemmas and insights of an elt teacher educator

dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Aysun
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T19:02:30Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T19:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, the writer discusses the philosophical underpinnings of the two dominant research methods in social sciences; quantitative and qualitative paradigms. The natures of two paradigms are quite different so this leads many researchers to discuss these issues in a comparative way. This paper tackles the knowledge and understanding of quantitative and qualitative paradigms, their nature, advantages, disadvantages, assumptions, criticisms, and the possibility of linking two paradigms. Issues of validity, reliability, objectivity, and generalisation are also investigated from two distinctive perspectives of paradigms. Finally, the conclusion and suggestions are given at the end of the paper. The novice researchers who are in dilemmas about making decisions about their research designs would potentially find the discussions useful.
dc.identifier.doi10.5539/ies.v5n1p57
dc.identifier.endpage66
dc.identifier.issn1913-9039
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84860842872
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage57
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n1p57
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/13534
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Education Studies
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250125
dc.subjectGeneralisation; Objectivity; Qualitative paradigm; Quantitative paradigm; Reliability; Validity
dc.titleCompeting paradigms: The dilemmas and insights of an elt teacher educator
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar