Does usage of peritonism tests in an emergency department have any benefit?
dc.contributor.author | Akdur, Okhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Durukan, Polat | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozkan, Seda | |
dc.contributor.author | Sozuer, Erdogan M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Avsarogullari, Levent | |
dc.contributor.author | Ikizceli, Ibrahim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-27T19:02:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-27T19:02:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.department | Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim To evaluate the usage of inspiration, expiration, cough, and heel drop jarring tests that are applied for determination of peritonism in cases with acute abdominal pain. Methods A prospective study based on observation of patients between 16-65 years of age and presented to the Emergency Department within a 3-month period starting from June 2007, was conducted. The patients were asked to rate their pain level between "0" and "10". Following the measurement of the vital signs, 4 tests were conducted by an emergency medicine resident. The medical records of all the patients were reviewed after 3 months. Data concerning clinical diagnosis, hospital admission and discharge processes, and surgical results, were all recorded. Results Seventy-seven patients had peritonism tests performed. Inspiration test was positive in 29 (of 51, 56.9%) patients admitted to the hospital. However, there was no correlation between the cases admitted to the hospital and the other 3 tests (p>0.05). Twenty-one (of 34, 61.8%) patients which have been subjected to surgical treatment, showed positive inspiration test results. Surgical treatment was performed on nine (of 11, 81.8%) patients who showed positive results for all 4 tests. Conclusion The applied tests are helpful in determining a serious abdominal disease, particularly alongside findings of rebound, tenderness, and laboratory results. | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 109 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1840-0132 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24496349 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84893208684 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 105 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/13674 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Medicinski Glasnik | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_Scopus_20250125 | |
dc.subject | Abdominal pain; Decision making; Diagnosis | |
dc.title | Does usage of peritonism tests in an emergency department have any benefit? | |
dc.type | Article |