Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings Detected in Internal Acoustic Canal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Audiovestibular Symptoms

dc.contributor.authorEker, Nebil
dc.contributor.authorKaratag, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Sule
dc.contributor.authorEker, Esen
dc.contributor.authorGuclu, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Huseyin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T20:47:26Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T20:47:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description28th Annual Meeting of the Turkish-Society-of-Neuroradiology with International Participation -- FEB 15-17, 2019 -- Istanbul, TURKEY
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Retrocochlear pathology associated with audiovestibular symptoms is detected in very few of the patients, and most of the internal acoustic canal magnetic resonance imaging examinations (IAC-MRIs) are either completely normal or include accompanying incidental findings (IFs). The aim of our study is to reveal the presence and frequency of IFs in IAC-MRIs, together with retrocochlear lesions. In addition, we intend to emphasize the clinical importance of these IFs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 374 serial IAC-MRI scans. Results: Gender distribution: 201 males and 173 females. Age range: 2-82 years. Seventy-two scans (19.25%) were totally normal. Fifteen scans (4.01%) demonstrated only pontocerebellar angle findings (PCAFs). The presence of PCAF and IF was together in 57 scans (15.24%). In 230 (61.50%) of the scans, only IFs were present. The incidence of IFs in all IAC-MRIs was 76.74% (287 of 374). Critical findings that may require clinical further evaluation and examination were present in 34 scans (9.09%). IFs that did not require further examination were observed in 253 scans (67.65%). Conclusion: Various IFs can be detected with IAC-MRI that may cause similar symptoms with PCAF. And unfortunately, some of these IFs may be of very high clinical importance. All referral clinicians should know well that these audiovestibular symptoms can appear as IFs anywhere in the auditory pathway, and how they should be followed in their clinical approach.
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Soc Neuroradiol
dc.identifier.endpage211
dc.identifier.issn1302-7123
dc.identifier.issn1308-5123
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid35990306
dc.identifier.startpage202
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/24901
dc.identifier.volume56
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000823035600006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKare Publ
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectAuditory diseases
dc.subjectcentral
dc.subjectauditory pathways
dc.subjectincidental findings
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectneurotology
dc.titleFrequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings Detected in Internal Acoustic Canal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Audiovestibular Symptoms
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar