Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAydoğdu, Hasan Murat
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Damla Güneş
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T07:14:34Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T07:14:34Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationAydoğdu, H. M., Yıldız, P. & Ünlü, D.G. (2024). A comparative study of translucency and color perception in monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate veneers. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23789en_US
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23789
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/5653
dc.description.abstractCeramic laminate veneers which are a conservative approach to restoring anterior teeth, combining minimal preparation and esthetics. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the thickness of monolithic zirconia laminate veneers on their optical properties and color perception, comparing them to lithium disilicate. A total of 60 laminate veneers were prepared using two ceramic materials, divided into three groups for each material (n = 10) with thicknesses of 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mm. CIELab color parameters of the veneers were measured using a spectrophotometer and translucency parameters were calculated. The veneers were cemented onto uniform dies and final L, a, b values of the restorations were measured. The color difference between the different thicknesses was calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni HSD post hoc tests were conducted to compare the color parameters (α = 0.05). The results showed that both material type (p < 0.001) and thickness (p < 0.001) influenced translucency values. The translucency values of zirconia veneers were significantly lower than those of lithium disilicate. The color differences (ΔE00) resulting from thickness changes (0.5–1.0 mm) were near or below the perception threshold for lithium disilicate, but distinct for zirconia restorations. In conclusion, monolithic zirconia veneers demonstrated lower translucency compared to lithium disilicate. Changing the material thickness affected the translucency of both materials, but not the color perception only for zirconia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectColor perceptionen_US
dc.subjectDental veneersen_US
dc.subjectOptical processesen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of translucency and color perception in monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate veneersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1179-8957en_US
dc.relation.ispartofHeliyonen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.institutionauthorAydoğdu, Hasan Murat
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23789en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidHKE-7404-2023en_US
dc.authorscopusid58779342200en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001148003100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180585666en_US
dc.identifier.pmidPMID: 38192772en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess