Yazar "Alparslan, Kenan" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    A validity and reliability study of the turkish version of the ambivalent ageism scale
    (Geriatrics Society, 2020) Öztürk, Ahu; Tosun, Leman Pınar; Özdemir, Gamze; Çavuşoğlu, Merve; Alparslan, Kenan; Polat, Dilan; Karlidağ, Sercan
    Introduction: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, which measures 2 forms of ageism, namely benevolent and hostile ageism. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 222 adults through an online survey. Participants completed Turkish versions of the 13-item Ambivalent Ageism Scale and the Implicit Association Test adapted for ageism. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency and split-half consistency were also calculated. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating ambivalent ageism and its subscales with implicit ageism scores. Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis of 12-items confirmed the original structure by exhibiting a good fit to the data (goodness of fit index = 0.93, p <.001, comparative fit index = 0.97, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07). Internal consistency of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale and its 2 subscales were found to be satisfactory, with Cronbach’s alpha being .89 for benevolent ageism (9 items), .79 for hostile ageism (3 items), and .89 for the total scale. Scale had a high split-half reliability coefficient (0.95). Implicit ageism positively correlated with ambivalent ageism (total score) and both benevolent ageism and hostile ageism (.22, .21, and .16, respectively). Except for cognitive assistance/protection, which was a sub-factor of benevolent ageism, no age and gender difference was found in any of the ageism scores. Conclusion: It was decided that the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale is a valid and reliable measure of negative attitudes toward older adults. © 2020, Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AMBIVALENT AGEISM SCALE
    (Gunes Kitabevi Ltd Sti, 2020) Ozturk, Ahu; Tosun, Leman Pinar; Ozdemir, Gamze; Cavusoglu, Merve; Alparslan, Kenan; Polat, Dilan; Karlidag, Sercan
    Introduction: This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, which measures 2 forms of ageism, namely benevolent and hostile ageism. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from 222 adults through an online survey. Participants completed Turkish versions of the 13-item Ambivalent Ageism Scale and the Implicit Association Test adapted for ageism. Construct validity was assessed through confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency and split-half consistency were also calculated. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating ambivalent ageism and its subscales with implicit ageism scores. Results: The results of confirmatory factor analysis of 12-items confirmed the original structure by exhibiting a good fit to the data (goodness of fit index = 0.93, p <.001, comparative fit index = 0.97, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.07). Internal consistency of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale and its 2 subscales were found to be satisfactory, with Cronbach's alpha being .89 for benevolent ageism (9 items), .79 for hostile ageism (3 items), and .89 for the total scale. Scale had a high split-half reliability coefficient (0.95). Implicit ageism positively correlated with ambivalent ageism (total score) and both benevolent ageism and hostile ageism (.22, .21, and .16, respectively). Except for cognitive assistance/protection, which was a sub-factor of benevolent ageism, no age and gender difference was found in any of the ageism scores. Conclusion: It was decided that the Turkish version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale is a valid and reliable measure of negative attitudes toward older adults.
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    THE SUPPORT, RISKY BEHAVIORS AND AGEISM TENDENCIES OF HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS TO THE PREVENTION MEASURES FROM THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    (T.C. Milli Egitim Bakanligi, 2022) Kuşdİl, M. Ersin; Tosun, Leman Pınar; Öztürk, Ahu; Alparslan, Kenan; Özdemİr, Gamze; Çavuşoğlu, Merve; Kablanoğlu, Anıl
    In April, when the restrictions for COVID-19 outbreak were implemented in Turkey, a curfew was imposed first on those aged sixty-five and above, and then on those under 20 as a health measure. To fight against outbreak effectively, the attitudes of the youth towards the official measures are important. Disobeying to health-related enforcement risks people’s health, and it is known that young people have a tendency to exhibit risky behaviors. In the present study, the support for the official restrictions, their risk behavior and ageism tendencies by the youth living in the large cities of Turkey were examined. Data was collected through an online survey from 2096 high school seniors (1461:F, 635:M). The results revealed that students generally supported restrictions aimed at combating the outbreak, with the least supported restrictions being those related to traveling and social gatherings. According to their self-report, young people engage in risky behaviors rarely, and their hostile ageism levels are low, while their benevolent ageism levels are relatively high. Risky behaviors at some domains (risky traffic behaviors and violation of hygiene norms) are significant predictors of the support for the restrictions for the outbreak, and benevolent ageism predicts support for the measures against the COVID-19 outbreak, even after risky behaviors have been controlled. © 2022. MİLLÎ EĞİTİM. All Rights Reserved.