Force-Based Characterization of the Wetting Properties of LDPE Surfaces Treated with CF4 and H-2 Plasmas
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/Date
2023Author
Aktaş, CihanPolat, Osman
Beitollahpoor, Mohamadreza
Farzam, Melika
Pesika, Noshir S.
Şahiner, Nurettin
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Aktaş, C., Polat, O., Beitollahpoor, M., Farzam, M., Pesika, N. S., & Şahiner, N. (2023). Force-Based Characterization of the Wetting Properties of LDPE Surfaces Treated with CF4 and H2 Plasmas. Polymers, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092132Abstract
Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films are widely used in packaging, insulation and many other commodity applications due to their excellent mechanical and chemical properties. However, the water-wetting and water-repellant properties of these films are insufficient for certain applications. In this study, bare LDPE and textured LDPE (T-LDPE) films were subjected to low-pressure plasmas, such as carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) and hydrogen (H2), to see the effect of plasma treatment on the wetting properties of LDPE films. In addition, the surface of the LDPE film was textured to improve the hydrophobicity through the lotus effect. The LDPE and T-LDPE films had contact angle (θ) values of 98.6° ± 0.6 and 143.6° ± 1.0, respectively. After CF4 plasma treatments, the θ values of the surfaces increased for both surfaces, albeit within the standard deviation for the T-LDPE film. On the other hand, the contact angle values after H2 plasma treatment decreased for both surfaces. The surface energy measurements supported the changes in the contact angle values: exposure to H2 plasma decreased the contact angle, while exposure to CF4 plasma increased the contact angle. Kinetic friction force measurements of water drops on LDPE and T-LDPE films showed a decrease in friction after the CF4 plasma treatment, consistent with the contact angle and surface energy measurements. Notably, the kinetic friction force measurements proved to be more sensitive compared to the contact angle measurements in differentiating the wetting properties of the T-LDPE versus 3× CF4-plasma-treated LDPE films. Based on Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of the flat LDPE samples, the 3× CF4 plasma treatment did not significantly change the surface morphology or roughness. However, in the case of the T-LDPE samples, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images showed noticeable morphological changes, which were more significant at sharp edges of the surface structures.
Volume
15Issue
9Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: