Comparisons of alternative feedlot runoff management systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKızıl, Ünal
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T21:00:10Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T21:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractTwo vegetative treatment and containment systems were designed in Oliver and Dunn Counties of North Dakota, USA. The results showed that unit costs for the systems designed in Oliver County were 8.83 and 7.18 $/m(2) for vegetative treatment system and containment systems, respectively. Same values for Dunn County design were 7.22 and 5.82 $/m(2). According to the results, vegetative treatment systems are not always the best practice to manage feedlot runoff. The topography and climate of the location should be carefully studied before making a decision.
dc.identifier.endpage242
dc.identifier.issn1991-637X
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77649165971
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/26952
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000275379800009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Journals
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20250125
dc.subjectAgricultural runoff
dc.subjectvegetative treatment systems
dc.subjectstorage pond
dc.titleComparisons of alternative feedlot runoff management systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu